Metaverse Laws and Law Enforcement

The metaverse legal system will mirror the real-world legal system.

The Metaverse Code of Conduct

The first step in designing the necessary metaverse criminal justice system brings us back to our futurist topic from last week. We eventually will have a blockchain-enabled repository of laws and regulations for personal and commercial conduct in this virtual space. It will mirror in many ways the structure and content of laws in the real world since much of the real world is replicated in the metaverse.

Some aspects of the real world’s code could be discarded in the metaverse code. Others would have to be added. The idealized rules we identified last week for maintaining this code (sunsetting laws, making them readable at an 8th-grade level, etc.) would apply here too. Who would write the codes? Elected metaverse officials perhaps aided by metaverse citizen voting on the most critical matters.

Metaverse Law Enforcement

When it comes to cybercrimes related to NFTs and financial fraud, currently established real-world law enforcement agencies currently are adding new resources and skillsets to patrol this area of the virtual space. So far so good. This will shift, though, to sanctioned metaverse officers patrolling this space. They’ll be working their metaverse beats day and night, aided by artificial intelligence that helps ferret out anomalous behavior that requires further investigation.

Metaverse Courts

Here we need to make a distinction between metaverse trials that are essentially virtual trials of cases from the real world and metaverse trials held in the comprehensive metaverse for crimes committed in cyberspace. The former is an extension of the remote elements of recent trials during the pandemic.

The latter, though, will be an extension of, ironically, one of the first criminal courts in the Dark Web. This court was actually designed by cybercriminals to adjudicate cyber cases between cybercriminals. While not a metaverse activity per se, this kind of small-claims adjudication system brought complaints between criminals to an impartial judge who would deliver a ruling and establish fines or compensation.

This approach could serve as the basis of addressing certain types of civil matters in the metaverse – an NFT ownership case, for example, between two relatively well-intentioned parties.

But criminals, stalkers, thieves, and assailants would not be likely to agree to this kind of arbitration. Thus, we’ll have elected avatar judges and randomly selected juries of avatar peers to address avatar criminal behavior.

Lockups in the Metaverse

Punishing the guilty bad actors in the metaverse could be the trickiest element of the future metaverse legal system. Sure, we can detect and delete an avatar and even try to identify the person behind it. But our goal will have to be to sanction that person behind the avatar in hopes that their future avatars behave better.

I don’t see a way to prevent that person, though, from placing new avatars in the metaverse, using new usernames, credentials, networks, and hardware. And until we figure this out, we’ll likely resort to a whack-a-mole approach to punishing bad avatar-actors, deleting them as fast as they emerge.

Meet the New ‘’Verse, Same as the Old Verse’

Good conduct. Rules. Consequences. Structure. Punishment. Yes, this all makes the metaverse sound a bit boring and maybe, for some, too much like the real universe from which they’re trying to escape. But if we don’t have this kind of empowered metaverse law enforcement and judicial system, the good citizens will get out of metaverse Dodge and leave it to the marauders and horse thieves!