Home Education Taking a deeper look at corporal punishment data

Taking a deeper look at corporal punishment data

0


Last fall, I started talking to people about school discipline after reading about the behavior challenges educators were describing with the return to in-person learning. I wondered how schools were going to approach exclusionary discipline after the whole country had spent the last year talking about how important it is for students to be in schools. One of the people I spoke with, Cara McClellan, is an attorney with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. She suggested I look into corporal punishment as part of my research into exclusionary discipline because she had heard of a district in Tennessee asking families to choose between the paddle and suspension. “The options that families are being given are both so unfair and unjust to students that it’s like, is this really a choice?” McClellan told me.

I hadn’t originally planned on writing about corporal punishment. But McClellan piqued my interest. After reading many reports and making many more phone calls, I realized the practice was common, not unique to this district in Tennessee. And my research pulled me to a different community.

My investigation into the continued use of corporal punishment in the U.S., which we published last Monday in partnership with the Mississippi Center for Investigative Reporting, focuses on Collins Elementary School in the Covington County Public Schools in southeastern Mississippi. Collins Elementary stood out in a national dataset for its widespread use of paddling in 2017-18, in a state where paddling is more common and opposition to it is more organized than anywhere else. I’ll let you read the story to learn more about how and why the disciplinary practice remains in Mississippi and 18 other states. Here, I’d like to share other numbers.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here