Mothers with partners who also identified as mothers have substantially higher rates of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes than mothers with partners who identified as fathers, according to a new study.

Adverse outcomes include life-threatening complications such as postpartum hemorrhage.

The study of nearly 1.5 million births in California is the first population-based study to investigate obstetric health among sexual and gender minorities in the United States.

“We found that there is a diversity of parent structures in California, meaning different family constellations with different demographics and health outcomes,” says Juno Obedin-Maliver, an assistant professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Stanford University, and senior author of the study in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

“The disparities faced by people who were mothers in partnership with a mother were striking.”

Doctors need to pay attention to the health risks associated with giving birth as part of a nontraditional family, she adds, because many of the risks, including elevated blood pressure, postpartum hemorrhage, and twin pregnancies, could be addressed with better medical care.

There is a growing need to understand the reproductive health of sexual and gender minorities, Obedin-Maliver says. More young adults identify as being in these groups than in the past, and they are now more likely to build families by giving birth.

“The disparities faced by people who were mothers in partnership with a mother were striking,” says lead author Stephanie Leonard, an instructor of obstetrics and gynecology.

“The crude observed rates of postpartum hemorrhage were about double compared with people in mother-father partnerships, and after we adjusted for confounding factors, hemorrhage risk was still about 40% higher. That was more than I had expected.”

Digging into the data

A change in California’s birth certificates enabled the study. Since 2016, instead of asking for identifying information about the baby’s mother and father, the forms request the “parent giving birth” and “parent not giving birth,” allowing each role to be specified as “mother,” “father,” or “parent.”

The biological sex of the “parent not giving birth” is not provided on the certificate; neither is the gender identity of either parent. The new forms enable all parents to accurately report their family structures and establish legal parentage. Because California’s birth certificate data is available for research purposes and is linked to electronic health records, the change also created opportunities to study the health of LGBTQ+ parents during pregnancy and birth.

The researchers studied all California live births from 2016 through 2019 for which the birth certificates had information on both parents. For any pregnancy with multiple births, such as twins or triplets. Researchers only used parent records from the first child born to avoid double-counting outcomes from a single pregnancy.

The study included 1,483,119 mothers giving birth who had a partner described as “father” on the birth certificate; 2,572 mothers giving birth with a partner described as “mother;” and 498 parents described as “fathers”—possibly transgender men—giving birth with any partner.

The study did not detect any increased risks for fathers giving birth.

Among these three groups, mothers with mother partners had the highest rates of multiple births (twins or more); hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including mild and severe preeclampsia; induction of labor; cesarean delivery; postpartum hemorrhage, or bleeding; severe maternal or obstetrical morbidity (a combined measure of several life-threatening birth complications); non-transfusion severe morbidity (all life-threatening birth complications other than blood transfusion); and premature delivery.

Infants born to mothers with mother partners had the highest rates of low birthweight and low Apgar scores, which measures newborns’ health five minutes after birth.

“Pregnancy and birth should not be traumatic.”

The researchers statistically adjusted their findings for several possible confounding factors, including patient age, method of payment for birth hospitalization, educational attainment, race/ethnicity, number of prior births, twins or other multiples, pre-pregnancy body mass index, and pre-existing health conditions.

After adjustment, mothers with mother partners were about four times as likely to have a multiple pregnancy; about 20% more likely to have had labor induced; and 40% more likely to experience postpartum hemorrhage, severe morbidity, or nontransfusion severe morbidity when compared with mothers who had father partners.

After adjustment, these groups did not have significant differences in their rates of cesarean birth or severe pre-eclampsia or eclampsia. There were no significant risk differences after adjustment between fathers giving birth and mothers with father partners.

Medical care disparities

“I was surprised that the largest differences for mothers with mother partners were in rates of postpartum hemorrhage and severe morbidity,” Leonard says.

Prior research has shown that lesbian and bisexual women have elevated rates of cardiovascular conditions, hypertension, and diabetes, so the research team had expected to see higher rates of pregnancy complications related to these pre-pregnancy conditions instead, she says.

The differences that persisted after accounting for pre-pregnancy disease, especially in postpartum hemorrhage, suggest that mothers with mother partners are receiving less adequate medical care during pregnancy, and also that caregivers need much more awareness of inequities faced during pregnancy and birth by sexual and gender minorities, and how these may intersect with other types of discrimination patients may also face, she adds.

“Our goal is not just to prevent severe outcomes but also to promote positive experiences with pregnancy and childbirth for all parents,” Leonard says. “Pregnancy and birth should not be traumatic.”

More research is needed to explore why differences exist and how they can be mitigated, Obedin-Maliver says.

“As a physician, I think of three principles for caring for LGBTQ+ people,” she says. “One is that they are different from non-LGBTQ+ people because they have a daily experience of living in a world that doesn’t see and consider them; the second is that they are the same as everyone, needing the same ultrasounds, blood tests, and high-quality medical care; and the third is that each patient is unique. As scientists and clinicians, we need to take into account all those things.”

Stanford medical student Adary Zhang; Brent Monseur, a fellow in obstetrics and gynecology; and Elliott Main, a clinical professor of obstetrics and gynecology and medical director of the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative are coauthors of the paper. Additional researchers are from UC San Francisco.

The study’s authors include members of the Stanford Maternal and Child Health Research Institute, which also provided the funding for the study.

Source: Stanford University